What Really Happened On November 22, 1963

The John F. Kennedy Assassination

As you may already know, there has always been a certain iffy-ness surrounding the assassination of our former president, John F. Kennedy. The president was shot while taking part in a parade with Texas Governor, John Connely, sitting in a convertible. Speculation began shortly after when the assassin was shot and killed by a random night club owner the night after the president's assassination. Clouds of doubt built within the general population about whether there was a government cover-up along with the aid of the FBI/CIA. Doubts also increased when autopsy reports were released and it was concluded that it was physically impossible for Oswald, the arraigned assassin, to have shot the president as he did from the angle of which the Warren Commission said happened. 

WARNING: FOOTAGE DOES CONTAIN LIVE ACTUAL MURDER

If you had the stomach to watch the video and see for yourself what happened, you might be able to glimpse the blur of multiple projectiles. If you ask me I completely believe the conspiracy of multiple shooters. This theory is the most popular and according to shooters at US Marine Sniper School, Oswald could not have acted alone. They have attempted to recreate the situation but simply could not perform the hit with the exact same outcome. Other evidence includes the amount of bullets and where they ended up inside of the governor, the president, and an FBI lead car. The last solid piece of evidence that "proves" multiple shooters is the fact that the presidents body lurches forward due to a bullet, or perhaps bullets, hitting him from the front. There was no real defense against this aspect of the murder but seemed to have been completely forgotten or pushed to the side when deciding if a conspiracy was fault for the assassination. 

Other conspiracies have been brought up throughout the years since his assassination many come and go but some do tend to stick around and make us go "Huh" and ponder what if that could actually be true. Many people wanted to see Kennedy go down. 

Here is a list of the top suspects who could have been behind the assassination.

1. Lyndon Johnson
2. The C.I.A
3. J. Edgar Hoover
4. H. L. Hunt
5. The Mafia
6. Anti-Castro Cubans
7. General Edward Lansdale
8. Richard Nixon

All of these suspects had legitimate reasons to see the president die. Whether these reason immediately increased their power, gave them the upper hand in an upcoming political race, or simply gave them some kind of sick satisfaction knowing that JFK was gone.

For all purposes I myself do believe that John F. Kennedy was set up.Whether there was some kind of existing agreement between two parties or simply someone on the inside, being american, wanted him gone, evidence was clearly pushed aside with intent to have this become a part of history quietly. 

In conclusion, I will leave it up to you, the general population who has enough interest to view this blog. Upon revisiting the home page, there will be a poll. I request your opinion on the matter of whether this assassination was purely by random or was set up by agencies worldwide with assistance by the american government or solely on the american government.

For now the real answer remains:

Anonymous

Work Cited

Herman, Douglas. "Count the Bullets: Blow Away All Arguments | Strike-The-Root: A Journal Of Liberty." Strike-The-Root: A Journal Of Liberty. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Feb. 2012. <http://www.strike-the-root.com/51/herman/herman16.html>.

count, one, 35 witnesses, behind the President, and 5 witnesses thought that the shots came from two directions.. "John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia." Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Feb. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_conspiracy_theories>.

testimony, an unchecked military-industrial complex. There is sworn, and from one. "Suspects in the JFK Assassination." Kenneth A. Rahn's Home Page. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Feb. 2012. <http://www.kenrahn.com/jfk/the_critics/griffith/Suspects.html>.

Source One: This source was located by doing a Google search on the shooting of JFK. When read, you come across quotations from a former United States marine sniper, who now trains at the United States Marine Sniper Training Program, saying that when recreating the hit, the assassination could not be created by a marksman of sniper caliber while the hit was done by a random guy. Supposedly. This has extreme relevance when pertaining to my topic due to the fact that his finding clearly negates the findings done by the Warren Commission. So either his sniper certification needs to be revoked or the Warren Commission was not telling the truth to begin with.

Source Two: This source was located by doing a Google search on the theory of multiple shooters on the assassination of JFK. When watching footage of the assassination, you can see multiple projectiles flying towards the target. The Warren Commission stated that there was only one possibility in the shooting of John F. Kennedy and that it was done by Oswald. This source also gives a list of the possible suspects at to who would have wanted him to die. The relevance of this source is consistent with the first source, being one that gives evidence against the Warren Commission's findings. The evidence continues to stack up against the Warren Commission and brings up the question of whether or not the Warren Commission was in on the cover up of the assassination or whether they were run by a bunch of idiots. ;)

Source Three: This was where i started my research on the John F. Kennedy assassination and I found it as a very informative by detail lacking generalization of the assassination. It gave me more insight on what actually happened, how it happened, and possibilities of why it happened. It led me to think and ponder on the subject and gave me motivation to go and learn more on certain details of the assassination. The relevance is clear because every person who seeks out information must start his or her research somewhere and Wikipedia although may not always be one-hundred percent trustworthy, the site provides its sources, giving  you another place to gain knowledge.